Date:Friday, 3rd September 2010
Local News

Business

FTSE/JSE Indices
All Share
27840.98
Resource 20
46406.02
Industrial 25
23274.90
Financial 15
7868.99
Commodities
Brent Crude Oil
76.50
Gold
1251.17
Platinum
1554.50
Currencies
ZAR/EUR
9.29
ZAR/GBP
11.18
ZAR/USD
7.25
Courtesy of(15 minute delay)

Quick Vote

Is the nationalisation of mines good?
 

Blogs

Cape Bar Council refers racism allegations to Chief Justice PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 14 October 2005 02:06
Cape Bar Council refers racism allegations to Chief Justice
By Wendell Roelf
CAPE TOWN – The Cape Bar Council has referred to Chief Justice Pius Langa allegations of racism against the Judge President of the Cape Division John Hlophe.
“If these allegations are indeed true, they are most disturbing since they completely undermine the Judge President’s public stand on racism and, in addition, seriously impair the position that he holds,” said advocate Ashton Schippers, chairman of the Cape Bar Council.
Schippers said the Cape Bar had noted with concern recent media reports regarding allegations of racism on the part of Hlophe.
Hlophe is alleged to have called attorney Joshua Greeff a “piece of white shit” in the presence of advocate and former acting judge Dirk Uijs, acting justice Tandaswa Ndita and prosecutor Christehenus van der Vijfer.
The Bar Council was informed by Uijs and his instructing attorney Greeff that they met with Hlophe following an interview by Greeff with the media on August 29 this year.
In that meeting, Greeff told Hlophe the conviction of an accused, whom he and Uijs had defended before Ndita, was based on circumstantial evidence and that leave to appeal would be sought against the conviction.
On August 31, after the accused was sentenced to life imprisonment, Uijs applied for leave to appeal, but Ndita did not consider the application and adjourned the court.
Shortly afterwards, Uijs was called to Hlophe’s office -- for the meeting at which Greeff, Ndita and Van der Vijfer were present.
Uijs avers in an affidavit submitted to the Bar that Hlophe accused Greeff of being racially prejudiced, said he should go back to Holland, and that he was not fit to walk in the corridors of the high court.
Schippers said Greeff was prepared to submit an affidavit to this effect.
He said another serious implication, should the allegations prove to be true, was the silence on the part of Ndita.
“All of this does not augur well for the relationship between the Bench on the one hand, and the Bar and the wider legal profession, on the other.” – Sapa.