The proposed cell phone tower on the grounds of Village Church on Crestwood Drive, has sparked frustration among Lonehill residents, who say they were given only nine days to submit objections. Residents argue the short timeframe, combined with limited communication about the project, has left them sidelined in a matter that could directly affect their daily lives.
According to resident Garth Berisford-Maynard, whose home sits just 20m from the proposed mast, the objections process felt like a formality, rather than meaningful engagement. “I was told my objection was meaningless, and that residents need not even be informed of the proposed installation. Apparently, only the councillor needed to be notified, and that as a courtesy.”

Read more: Lonehill residents oppose proposed cell tower on Crestwood Drive

Concerns raised include the potential health risks linked to prolonged exposure to electromagnetic radiation, which some international studies suggest may contribute to cancer, fertility challenges, and other health issues. Berisford-Maynard cited research recommending a safe distance of at least 400m from such towers.

Beyond health risks, residents fear the tower could negatively impact Lonehill’s environment and community character. The nearby nature reserve and park, popular with families on weekends, could be disturbed, while local wildlife may also be at risk. Property values are another major worry, with studies by the Appraisal Institute showing homes near towers often sell for 10–20% less.

Also read: MTN protects Barn Owls nesting in cell towers

Noise pollution during construction, and generator use during load-shedding, are further issues residents say could disrupt sleep and increase stress. Berisford-Maynard also noted that in many countries, towers are restricted near schools, parks, hospitals, and old age homes, facilities all found near the Crestwood Drive site.

Ward 94 councillor David Foley confirmed he has received residents’ objections. “I met with affected residents, and we had a good discussion about what the constitution says about access to communication, the impact of the tower on residents, and the approval processes. The next meeting will be with the church management in early October.”

Town planner and project lead Henco Harmse acknowledged receiving more than 200 comments during the public participation period, which he says ran from July 1 to 29. In response to criticism about communication, Harmse explained that the application complies with the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act of 1977. “The act makes no mention that an applicant should notify the public via any form of publication of proposed developments, only that an application must be submitted to the local authority. Taking this into account, our office instructed that, at least, the ward councillor be notified, due to the ongoing theories surrounding towers.”

Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates!