TZANEEN – A proposed fuel station at the intersection of the Houtbosdorp Road and the R71 in Magoebaskloof is once again under scrutiny, as the Democratic Alliance (DA) urges Limpopo’s MEC for Economic Development, Environment and Tourism (Ledet), Matibe Tshitereke, to thoroughly review the application.

The DA has raised renewed concerns about environmental impact, road safety, and regulatory compliance. The location is known for heavy mist, high traffic volumes, and its proximity to ecologically sensitive areas.

In a statement, the DA highlighted multiple red flags: the land is currently zoned for agriculture, and the site falls within a Strategic Water Source Area (SWSA). The proposed development by Makgoba Asset Management (MAM) includes the use of 120 000 litres of water from an irrigation canal fed by the Helpmekaar River.

While developers claim this usage falls within an existing allocation, critics warn of potential harm to local ecosystems and endangered species such as the Cape Parrot and Narina Trogon.

Also read: Magoebaskloof brewery funds Cape Parrot conservation

The developer, MAM, is a joint venture between the Makgoba community and agricultural giant ZZ2, operating under a long-term lease agreement with the Mamphoku Makgoba Community Trust (MMCT).

Other issues raised and reported on previously by the Herald include poor visibility on the R71 due to mist and a high accident rate. The DA noted that Sanral had previously closed another filling station at the foot of the kloof for safety reasons, but appears to have approved this one on a blind rise, calling the decision contradictory.

“Magoebaskloof is a vital eco-tourism destination known for its peaceful environment and natural beauty. A 24-hour filling station could damage its appeal,” said DA Ledet spokesperson Jacques Smalle.

He added that the party plans to engage the provincial portfolio committee to propose legislation protecting environmentally and culturally sensitive areas from inappropriate development.

MAM project manager Martin van Veelen responded, defending the project.

“We welcome the DA’s request; it reinforces due process. All regulatory requirements have been met, and we’ve always been open to transparent, constructive engagement.”

Environmental group Mountain Environmental Watch in Haenertsburg also welcomed the increased scrutiny, stating that each new development in the catchment area contributes to the cumulative degradation of critical ecosystem services.

They called for transparent and informed decision-making.

Ledet spokesperson Hitekani Magwedza did not respond to the Herald’s request for comment.