Local newsNews

IRR warns that draft Mining Charter will retard industry growth

The IRR has long believed that South Africa’s mining industry has an indispensable role to play in leading the economic renaissance that the country so desperately needs.

If the new draft Mining Charter denotes the direction of mining policy, the mining industry is in for a tough time in the coming years.

Despite some improvements over the version produced to widespread dismay in 2017, it does not provide a framework for a competitive and sustainable industry.

YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN: Gold mining ‘barred’ in Harding amid safety fears

The IRR has long believed that South Africa’s mining industry has an indispensable role to play in leading the economic renaissance that the country so desperately needs. This is, however, contingent on an appropriate environment being in place to facilitate it – one that makes investment (and the risks that this entails) attractive.

The draft Charter does little to create this environment.

One point of particular concern is the requirement that companies seeking new mining rights must cede a five percent ‘free carry’ to their employees and to communities.

They will thus be required to give 10 percent of their equity away. As respected mining expert Peter Leon remarks: ‘This is likely to render marginal mining projects uneconomic and is a significant cost to shareholders.’

In addition, if the holder of a new mining right fails to pay dividends for five years, it must thereafter provide ‘trickle down’ dividends to employees and communities, calculated as one percent of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation. This is also likely to add to the cost of conducting business. It is also worth noting that paying such dividends to certain shareholders and not to others may be in contravention of the Companies Act of 2008.

Moreover, weighty demands are imposed on mining companies to procure locally. Some 70 percent of capital and other mining goods must be purchased from South African manufacturers, while 80 percent of the services that mines require must be supplied by South African companies. There are also substantial requirements for sourcing many of these goods and services from black-owned companies. It is not clear whether such companies already exist sufficient to the industry’s demands (especially in the field of capital goods, such as drilling equipment), and ‘establishing’ them may prove an additional cost.

The limitation on foreign procurement is contrary to South Africa’s binding obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) of the World Trade Organisation.

Beyond this, the foreign suppliers from whom 30 percent of mining goods and 20 percent of services may be purchased must contribute 0.5 percent of the annual turnover they generate from South African mining companies to the Mandela Mining Precinct for research. This 0.5 percent levy is a tax, which the mining minister has no authority to impose, and which can be introduced only by parliament.

Pixabay

The charter also suggests a large degree of ministerial discretion. It empowers the minister to ‘review’ the charter by notice in the Gazette. The implication is that he will be able to amend it unilaterally.

Taken together, these measures impose burdens on the mining industry that largely overshadow the relief granted by the charter’s recognition of empowerment deals that reached the 26 percent target before BEE beneficiaries sold out. Such companies will have to top up by only four percentage points to reach the 30 percent black ownership now required. This matter has received widespread media attention, and the new approach is largely a recognition of the ruling of the High Court in April this year.

The framework the draft charter creates will inevitably hold the mining industry back. The upshot will be a missed opportunity, as South Africa sits atop a multi-trillion rand mineral endowment, but is unable fully to utilise it owing to poorly conceived policy.

The IRR will be releasing a comprehensive analysis of the prospects for South African mining.

The report, ‘Sunset or Sunrise for Mining in South Africa’, notes that while the future of the industry is vital to the future of the country, fundamental choices will determine whether it becomes ‘a sunset industry beset by rising costs, technical challenges, adverse policies, and political hostility’, or a sunrise industry that is ‘able to transcend its current difficulties – and to take on a whole new lease of life with the help of the country’s enormous mineral wealth’.

The IRR invites all South Africans to join it in striving for a better South Africa by SMSing their name to 32823.

About IRR 

The IRR produces, disseminates, and promotes the new ideas that South African policy makers need in order to promote the investment and economic growth that will draw poor people into jobs and build a more prosperous South Africa.

HAVE YOUR SAY

Like our Facebook page, follow us on Twitter and Instagram

For news straight to your phone, add us on WhatsApp 082 421 6033

 

At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

Support local journalism

Add The Citizen as a preferred source to see more from South Coast Herald in Google News and Top Stories.

shonaaylward

Shona Aylward is a vastly experienced journalist working as a senior reporter. Aside from her extensive community involvement and story writing, she is also involved in creative page layout, and the various media platforms. Shona began her career with Caxton at the Southlands Sun. Previous to this she worked in the marketing industry for surf magazines. Shona is a renown 'greenie' and champions environmental causes. She is also Mom to a number of dogs and cats, and the occasional uninvited snake. When she can find some spare time, it's usually to the beach that she heads.
Back to top button