VIR die afgelope paar jaar was daar ‘n ANC aktiviste-groep, gelei deur “Nosey” Pieterse, wat onrus probeer opstook het onder plaaswerkers in die Wes-Kaap.
Sy teiken was veral die wynbedryf. Die minister het daarna die minimumloon verhoog. En almal was gelukkig, behalwe die boere. Hulle het bewys dat hulle die hoër lone eenvoudig net nie kan bekostig nie.
Vanjaar kyk “Nosey” op sy neus. Die wynboere het begin om te meganiseer. Struwwelpeter weet van ‘n plaaslike boer wat elke jaar ongeveer 180 tydelike arbeiders moes huur vir die plukseisoen. Nou het hy snoeimasjiene en oesmasjiene en hy het slegs sewe permanente werkers.
Omdat hierdie werkers tegnies opgelei is om met die masjinerie te werk, word hulle spesialislone betaal en almal is gelukkig. Almal behalwe Nosey Pieterse.
* * *
Gedagte vir die dag uit ‘n Max du Preez-rubriek: “Al ons vet generaals met groot sterre en groot stêrre.”
* * *
Interesting comment from Solidarity (thanks KGG and Mariano)
After president Jacob Zuma’s downright idiotic statement two weeks ago that all the problems in South Africa started with the arrival of Jan van Riebeeck in 1652, I have been noticing quite a number of Jan van Riebeeck profile pictures, cartoons and T-shirts going about. As could be expected, I would personally consider doing anything civilised to annoy Jacob Zuma as well.
But I think one should have one last word about this and then we can focus on the future again, instead of doing the ANC thing of dwelling in the past forever.
They have started with blaming apartheid for everything until they realised that some of us actually remember the years of apartheid and might not be as foolish as the majority of KFC-eating, my-vote-for-a-free-yellow-tee-shirt, snorting and dumping rubbish in the streets-voters are.
So now he tried to blame a section of history which nobody can remember first hand. Stupid! Europeans actually had the skill to write and record journals, and if the president bothered to read one or two from time to time, he might not make such a fool of himself. But I understand he said once that he is not one for reading much. That is very obvious, I fear.
The president passed standard 3 at school, I understand. Which explains his lack of knowledge, because the old standard 5 history text book was the one which taught us that Jan van Riebeeck was sent to the Cape to establish a halfway station for the trade ships of the Vereenigd Oost Indische Compagnie. There never was the intention of colonising or settling.
Uncle Jan wanted to open a tuck shop, not take over the (non-existent) government! We know that all too well, because he sent out only a few expeditions to trade cattle with the Khoi-groups in the Peninsula and allowed the first free citizens to measure out small farms only after a lengthy correspondence with Amsterdam. He left the Cape after a decade, never to return and never to look back.
Now, if Jacob Zuma wants to blame the first Dutch “settler”, we must look at the arrival of the last Commander of the Cape who also became the first governor in 1679. This was the man who started building the strong sandstone fortifications of the Castle of Good Hope, who measured out farms, planted endless avenues of trees, started new enterprises, in particular viticulture, and within three weeks after his arrival visited all the outposts of the Cape.
On the 3rd of November 1679 he arrived at a lovely spot nestled in the mountains by a river and decided to establish a “colony” of people there and to build a new town. This was a very clear indication that this man, Simon van der Stel, who named the new town, Stellenbosch, after himself, intended to stay and to create a new nation.
It is even more obvious as he, after his retirement, never left the Cape but went to live on his farm, Groot Constantia, despite the fact that his children all returned to the Netherlands. He lived for another 14 years before peacefully passing on, loved and respected and known as “Father Simon” by the people of the Cape – black and white alike. Simon van der Stel, the first colonialist…
Now, before you decide that you had the wrong spirit exorcised and that Jan van Riebeeck was only a visitor while Simon van der Stel was the bad guy who brought the white man to this country, here is a little challenge for you, Mr Zuma.
We have no reliable portrait of Simon van der Stel, only a description which tells us that he was short and stocky with very dark hair, oriental eyes, small flat nose and a yellowish complexion. And you know why that was? No, of course you don’t. In the records of the Dutch East India Company Simon van der Stel is described as “mestizo” – non-white.
His mother was the daughter of captain Hendrick Lievens and a Batavian slave woman, Mai Monica da Costa van Java.
You see, president Zuma, your first European coloniser wasn’t even a white man. In today’s South Africa he would be regarded as a Coloured person. So question is now: Are you going to exorcise the spirits of the ancestors of the Coloured people and tell them how unwelcome they are? Or of Indian South Africans whose ancestors originated from the same region as Simon van der Stel’s?
Mr Zuma, children should never play with matches, nor idiots toy with history.
* * *
Nietemin, President Zuma het geskiedenis gemaak: hy was, sover ek weet, die enigste president ooit wat gegiggel het van plesier toe sy opposisie uit die parlement stap.
Die rede vir sy giggle was duidelik – as hy net vir die ANC gaan toespreek, dan sal daar mos geen ongemaklike vrae wees nie!
