A 112-year-old home in Parkview has been illegally demolished, sparking a storm of anger among residents and heritage defenders who say Johannesburg’s historic neighbourhoods are being eroded by weak enforcement and growing lawlessness.

The house on Westcliff Drive, built in 1913, was reduced to rubble in mid-November without any of the legally required permits, notices, or public consultation. Despite stringent regulations protecting buildings older than 60 years, no application was submitted to the Provincial Heritage Resources Authority – Gauteng (PHRA-G), nor was a demolition notice ever displayed on the boundary wall.

The Parkview Residents’ Association (PRA) discovered the demolition on November 12 and immediately took action. Chairperson Philanie Jooste said the association urgently appealed to the City to halt all further work and impose the harshest possible penalties.

Read more: Zoo Lake Swimming Pool receives renewed attention after Rise Mzansi oversight

“Parkview’s character is rooted in its historic homes,” Jooste said. “It is deeply distressing when new owners disregard the law and destroy irreplaceable heritage. The loss of this home is not only illegal, but it is a direct attack on the soul of our suburb.”

Heritage bodies alarmed

Under the National Heritage Resources Act, the unauthorised demolition of a protected structure can lead to severe consequences – including penalties of up to six times the monthly property rates, criminal charges, orders to rebuild the structure, or a freeze on all future development. Yet despite repeated complaints, PHRA-G has remained largely silent.

The Johannesburg Heritage Foundation criticised what it described as PHRA-G’s “complete inertia”.

President Flo Bird said, “Only PHRA-G can confirm whether any permit was applied for. No notice has appeared on the property. They have taken no action, do not respond to emails, and claim they lack transportation to visit the site or even log the offence. Residents would happily drive the officials themselves if that is what it takes.”

She warned that illegal demolitions are escalating, citing other recent cases where homes were destroyed without proper approval.

Conflicting approvals and rising frustration

City building inspector Faried Watson later informed the PRA that PHRA-G had approved “additions and alterations” in May, limited to internal changes, and that building plans had been signed off in August. However, Jooste said these approvals do not justify a complete demolition.

“No proof of mandatory public engagement has been provided, and no notices were displayed,” she said. “Nothing suggests permission to flatten the entire structure.”

Region B Chief Building Inspector Lebo Theledi confirmed that a contravention notice and a Section 56 fine had been issued for demolishing without a permit. Theledi explained that a Section 56 fine is issued when someone contravenes the National Building Regulations, and in this case, the penalty is R4 000, with additional rate penalties expected to follow.

Also read: Zoo Lake Bowls Club aims to rise from the ashes as community launches rebuild fund

PRA condemns R4 000 fine as “unfathomable”

Jooste responded with disbelief at the low penalty, calling it inadequate and insulting.

“I cannot believe this,” she said. “Just this week I read in the Gazette that a resident was fined R100 000 for removing a pavement tree, yet the fine for demolishing a 112-year-old heritage home is R4 000? How are we supposed to deter residents from destroying heritage when this is the consequence? It is unfathomable.”

She added that the PRA expects the City to order the owner to reconstruct the home and significantly increase rates until proper permissions are obtained.

“If not,” she said, “the PRA will seek legal counsel. We have been patient enough with the City’s lack of commitment to heritage. A R4 000 fine and a disinterested attitude are disgraceful.”

Gazette enquiries go unanswered

The Gazette also reached out to PHRA-G on November 19 for comment. The authority responded to acknowledge the enquiry and stated it would provide a full response by November 21. To date, no comment or update has been received.

PHRA-G’s Noluthando Cembi separately acknowledged receipt of a letter from the PRA on November 25 and promised to provide feedback once the matter had been investigated. No further information has yet been provided.

Also read: St Martin’s Church brings health and hope to Rosebank’s homeless community

Community grief and fury

The demolition has left residents shocked and grieving the loss of one of Parkview’s few remaining unaltered original homes. Messages to the PRA described the act as “disgusting”, “devastating” and “absolutely terrible”. One resident wrote:

“There are so few original Parkview homes left. I hope whoever did this never gets permission to build anything but a replica of the original.”

PRA presses PHRA-G for decisive action

In a formal letter sent to PHRA-G on November 25, the PRA demanded confirmation that a stop order had been issued and called for all development rights on the property to be revoked. The association also urged the authority to lay criminal charges and to refuse any retrospective application for demolition.

“The owner has committed a criminal offence,” the letter states. “If PHRA-G does not act decisively, it risks losing all credibility. A dangerous precedent will be set, and illegal demolitions will only increase.”

Residents watch closely

Jooste says residents expect the City and PHRA-G to act swiftly and decisively.

“We cannot allow this kind of blatant disregard for heritage to continue,” she said. “Strong enforcement now will send a clear message that Johannesburg’s history cannot be bulldozed at will.”

For now, the rubble at 69 Westcliff Drive stands as a stark symbol of Johannesburg’s endangered architectural legacy and a community determined to fight for what remains.

Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration!