SECUNDA – Allegations of neglect of animals sheltered at the Highveld Ridge SPCA (HRSPCA) have recently surfaced.

Discoveries during inspections: NSPCA finds 136 animals allegedly suffering from diseases at HRSPCA

This stems from an impromptu visit by the National Council of SPCAs (NSPCA) to the HRSPCA in December, during which it discovered 73 animals allegedly suffering from severe diseases, yet allegedly not receiving treatment.

Again, during an inspection on February 7, 63 animals were found said to be suffering from severe health issues, including parvovirus, biliary, snuffles and mange. This brings the total to 136 animals in two months.

Response to allegations: HRSPCA issues detailed rebuttal amid claims of neglect

The HRSPCA, however, has issued a detailed response to these allegations.

It paints a stark picture of internal discord and underscores broader issues within the animal welfare community, including funding constraints, resource allocation and differing approaches to euthanasia policies.

It refutes the disease outbreak allegations and reaffirms its dedication to caring for all animals, regardless of age or condition.

They also criticised the NSPCA’s handling of the situation, accusing it of undermining their efforts and tarnishing their reputation, despite being made aware of the challenges and allegedly having been approached multiple times for assistance, to no avail.

NSPCA’s stance: NSPCA urges compassionate care for animals, prompt veterinary attention

In a press release, the NSPCA stated: “Our SPCAs nationwide ought to serve as sanctuaries and safe havens for all animals that are either unwanted or unaffordable, as well as those enduring suffering. Each animal should be afforded compassionate care, love and respect.

Sometimes, this care and love simply means special treatment before the animal is transferred to a place where it can live without suffering.”

It further indicated that any indication of illness or injury in animals under the care of an SPCA should prompt immediate attention from a veterinarian.

“Only if the SPCA possesses the necessary resources to provide proper treatment and nurture the animals back to health should they remain in its care. Animals should not endure further suffering while under the guardianship of an SPCA.”

Struggle with euthanasia: HRSPCA highlights challenges in providing on-site euthanasia services

The HRSPCA said it has struggled with on-site euthanasia due to not having a registered animal welfare assistant. Without one, it has been forced to rely on private veterinary services to carry out euthanasia.

This, it said, comes with the associated costs of using private veterinary services, as well as having limits placed on the HRSPCA as to the number of animals that are allowed to be euthanised.

NSPCA’s controversial action: NSPCA faces backlash by HRSPCA over mass euthanasia decision

“No assistance or solution was offered by the NSPCA, despite repeated pleas for help. The only course of action taken by the NSPCA was to arrive without warning and carry out a mass euthanasia of 106 animals, regardless of their condition.”

Read the complete article in Highvelder.