Crime

WATCH: Defence challenges child protection expert during Amber sentencing proceedings

Bouwer continues questioning Luke Lamprecht on his evidence and research, while Judge Mkhabela clarifies a key distinction between planned and premeditated murder.

Following a short break, the second part of Amber Lee Hughes’ sentencing proceedings continued in the Johannesburg High Court on Thursday, September 17, with defence attorney Marius Bouwer resuming his cross-examination of child protection and development specialist Luke Lamprecht.

Much of the afternoon centred on challenges to Lamprecht’s expert evidence, including his research, conclusions and terminology used in his report, while Judge Richard Mkhabela intervened on several occasions to clarify legal issues and keep the questioning within the scope of sentencing.

Defence questions expert’s research

Bouwer questioned whether Lamprecht had focused only on public criticism directed at Hughes while overlooking negative commentary aimed at Nada-Jane’s father.

@southern.courier

Defence questions expert’s research during Amber sentencing Lamprecht says his opinions are based on child abuse literature and reports he reviewed as the defence challenges his findings. Full story on southerncourier.co.za

♬ original sound – Southern Courier

Lamprecht said he could not comment on material he had not specifically researched.

The defence also questioned whether Lamprecht’s conclusions about denial and abuse were based on psychological expertise, with Lamprecht maintaining that his opinions were grounded in child abuse literature as well as the reports he had reviewed.

Judge clarifies planned and premeditated murder

During the reading of Lamprecht’s report, Judge Mkhabela corrected the repeated use of the term “premeditated murder”, reminding the court that Hughes had been convicted of planned murder and rape.

@southern.courier

Judge clarifies distinction between planned and premeditated murder Judge Mkhabela reminds the court that Amber Hughes was convicted of planned murder and rape as sentencing proceedings continue. Full story on southerncourier.co.za

♬ original sound – Southern Courier

Lamprecht apologised, saying he had already corrected the wording earlier in his evidence and had learned the legal distinction.

The judge noted that while the definitions differ, the prescribed sentence remains the same.

Court discusses remaining evidence

Before adjourning, Judge Mkhabela and Bouwer discussed how to conclude Lamprecht’s testimony without unnecessary delays, with the judge noting his upcoming urgent court commitments and encouraging an efficient finish to the cross-examination.

@southern.courier

Court discusses remaining evidence in Amber sentencing Judge Mkhabela and the defence discuss completing Lamprecht’s testimony as the State confirms no further evidence is expected. Full story on southerncourier.co.za

♬ original sound – Southern Courier

Bouwer told the court he needed time to refine parts of his questioning following earlier rulings that limited certain lines of cross-examination.

State advocate Rolene Barnard confirmed she had no further evidence beyond the remaining testimony expected from Lamprecht.

Proceedings continue on Friday

The sentencing proceedings are expected to resume at the Johannesburg High Court on Friday, September 18, when Lamprecht’s evidence is expected to conclude before the case moves to its next stage.

WATCH: Child protection specialist takes the stand in Amber sentencing proceedings

At Caxton, every story is written by humans. We use AI only to perform quality checks - never to generate the news. Happy reading!

Support local journalism

Add The Citizen as a preferred source to see more from Southern Courier in Google News and Top Stories.

Lucky Thusi and Katlego Ashley Tau

This article is written by Lucky Thusi and Katlego Ashley Tau, journalists from the Southern Courier.

Related Articles

Back to top button