The South African alcohol industry says it is disappointed with the decision to reinstate the prohibition of the sale of alcohol with immediate effect from Monday.
The National Liquor Traders Council, South African Liquor Brand owners Association (SALBA), Beer Association of South Africa (BASA), Vinpro, Liquor Traders Association of South Africa (LTASA) and several other manufacturers expressed their concern on the matter.
The alcohol industry said it engaged with government and especially the department of trade, industry, and competition (DTIC) over the past month regarding the efforts put in place to ensure compliance with regulations.
This included limited trading days and hours as well as adherence to the safety protocols in formal retail and taverns.
“Despite these engagements, the industry was given no warning about the ban, nor an opportunity to consult with the National Coronavirus Command Centre (NCCC) before a decision was made and no consideration was given to the immediate logistical difficulties it poses for both suppliers, distributors and retailers alike.”
OPINION & ANALYSIS: I’m so over this hangover, Cyril
The alcohol industry reportedly lost R18 billion in revenue and R3.4 billion in excise tax during the nine-week lockdown.
Excise tax is lost from the growth in the sale of illegal alcohol products, which don’t pay taxes.
“The industry has complied with all the commitments agreed with government ahead of the reopening of the supply chain on 1 June to enable a safe environment for the sale of alcohol.
“Indeed, there have been no instances where taverns have not complied with the regulations.”
They reiterated that Ramaphosa’s decision to reinstate the nation-wide ban on alcohol with immediate effect was “deeply troubling”.
“The liquor industry has a wide and deep value chain employing almost one million people across the country and the government’s decision has serious economic consequences, placing hundreds of thousands of livelihoods at risk.
“The hardest hit will be the significant number of smaller retailers and taverners. The immediate enforcement of the ban will have other unintended consequences which include further job losses throughout the value chain.”
The industry warned that further restricting legal trade of alcohol would fuel the growth of the illicit market while it also creates security concerns for liquor outlets.
“The illicit market is outside the regulatory reach of government and operates mostly uncontrolled. For this restriction to be viable, it must be accompanied by considerably increased law enforcement in this part of the market.
“While we acknowledge the urgency of the situation, it is crucial to understand the complexity of alcohol-related trauma so that we can sharpen our focus on the most effective interventions and also measure their impact against a shared understanding of the facts and the problems.
“This requires access to health and alcohol-related information in private and public sector hospitals and clinics which government has never shared with industry.”
The industry added that it believed that a more useful approach would be targeting problematic drinking to manage and achieve long-term, lasting changes.
“The regulation imposed has a significant negative economic impact and could have been designed in a less damaging manner, but with the same alleviation of the impact on the healthcare system.
“We reiterate our commitment to partner with government to create a social compact that drives behavioural change regarding the use and consumption of alcohol though countering unacceptable and irresponsible consumption; intervention programmes and enforcement of policies to address gender-based violence (GBV) and effect behavioural change.
“Also firm interventions against drinking/driving and walking with renewed practical support for enforcement in collaboration with the department of transport and the road traffic management corporation (RTMC) and dealing with illicit trade and enforcement.
“In this way, we can work together to create a social compact that not only works to save lives but also preserve livelihoods.”
This article first appeared on George Herald and was republished with permission.