From where did Mkhwebane get bank statements in Bosasa report, Ramaphosa asks
There are questions about where some bank statements came from and how they would have landed in her possession, the president's lawyers say.
President Cyril Ramaphosa. Picture: Fabrice COFFRINI / AFP
President Cyril Ramaphosa has raised questions about where Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane received some of the bank statements contained in her Bosasa report from, going as far as suggesting that she obtained them unlawfully.
Mkhwebane however maintains that her report is above board.
On Friday, it emerged that Ramaphosa had approached the Gauteng High Court in a bid to have certain bank statement in her report sealed and not made available to the public.
In the lawyer’s letter, which News24 has seen, the president’s lawyers argue that there are questions about where some bank statements came from and how they would have landed in the possession of the public protector.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa’s lawyers ask court to seal some information in Mkhwebane’s Bosasa report
Four bank accounts have been noted by Ramaphosa’s lawyers, including his own foundation’s account and the EFG2 account, which housed Ramaphosa’s ANC presidential campaign funds.
The other accounts are Linked Environmental Services and Ria Tenda Trust.
Ramaphosa’s spokesperson Khusela Diko told News24 that some of the documents belong to private entities and on that basis should remain confidential, as emphasised in the lawyer’s letter.
“It is our view that the documents are unrelated to the complaint the public protector was investigating and were or may have been obtained unlawfully.
“Since she improperly broadened her investigation into what are private entities not subject to her purview it is only appropriate that their privacy be protected as the law allows,” said Diko.
She further said the public protector is bound to keep the documents confidential in line with the public protector’s own rules and the Protection of Private Information Act.
“The Protection of Private Info Act is to protect against publication of unlawfully obtained information and the PP is not exempt from that act.
“If it was illegal as we contend for the public protector to even look at them, how can their private info not be protected?” Diko added.
Mkhwebane’s spokesperson Oupa Segalwe however said the investigation was above board.
“The PP conducted the investigation by the book. There was no [un]lawful activity,” Segalwe told News24.
Once filed in court, the documents become public information which would be available to everyone, Segalwe said.
For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.
