TZANEEN – Leo, a nine-year-old husky’s death has divided the Phalaborwa community and reignited debate about the protocols surrounding animal euthanasia.

Leo’s owners, who have asked to remain anonymous, say they are heartbroken and believe their pet’s death could have been prevented.

The family had adopted Leo eight years ago and had been treating him for an autoimmune and chronic skin condition.

Last week, the Herald reported on an incident in whereby Leo escaped from their enclosed yard on October 16 while his wife was out of town.

Read more: Phalaborwa family outraged after dog euthanised

He was caring for their two small children and managing three businesses, leaving home early and returning late.

He said he realised Leo was missing when I saw his food untouched.

The SPCA later confirmed they picked him up that morning around 10:00 in President Steyn Street, 300 metres from their home.

When he went to the SPCA the next morning, he was informed that Leo had already been euthanised.

“They said the vet decided to put him down because he was in pain and looked abused,” he said.

“If they had contacted our vet, who has been treating him for years, they would have known about his ongoing care and treatment.”

The SPCA later released a statement explaining its decision. It said the dog was taken directly to a veterinarian for assessment.

According to the SPCA, the veterinary report showed severe chronic skin disease, extensive hair loss, inflammation, and infected ear canals.

Tests confirmed demodectic mange with heavy bacterial and fungal infections.

“The veterinarian, Dr Gerrit Scheepers, found no signs of ongoing medical treatment and concluded that the condition was long-term and irreversible,” the SPCA stated. “In his expert opinion, euthanasia was the only humane option to end the animal’s suffering.”

The SPCA added that Leo had no microchip or identification tag, making it impossible to trace the owner before urgent action was required.

“The SPCA operates strictly within the Animals Protection Act No. 71 of 1962, which allows inspectors and veterinarians to act immediately when an animal is suffering severely,” the statement read.

“Every decision of this nature is made with deep care, compassion, and professional guidance.”

While the SPCA expressed sympathy for the family’s loss, the incident has fuelled public criticism, with some residents accusing the SPCA of euthanising animals too quickly.

Others have defended the organisation, saying the decision was justified given Leo’s condition.

Comments on the Herald’s Facebook page took sides on the matter.

“SPCA Phalaborwa does not follow protocol and is known for euthanising animals instead of rehoming.”

Another commenter, defending the association. “Huskies are high-energy dogs that often escape when bored. This one looked very ill; the vet made the right call.”