Formal inquest to be held into Life Esidimeni deaths
An enquiry led by Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke found that government officials had acted in breach of the law and the Constitution.
Former Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke during the Life Esidimeni arbitration hearing at Emoyeni Conference Centre, Parktown on October 10, 2017 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo by Gallo Images / Sowetan / Veli Nhlapo)
The Acting Director of Public Prosecutions (ADPP) – Pretoria, Advocate George Baloyi, has decided that a formal and joint inquest into all deaths related to the Esidimeni tragedy be held in the High Court of Pretoria before a judge.
The directorate said in a statement that this follows an arbitration enquiry into the Life Esidimeni tragedy.
This “was established following recommendations by the Health Ombudsman after compiling a report called ‘The Ombud’s report’ detailing findings into a probe to establish the circumstances surrounding the deaths of mentally ill patients that were moved from Life Esidimeni Healthcare Facility to various Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) in Gauteng”.
ALSO READ: WATCH: Life Esidimeni arbitration hearings
“The enquiry, led by retired Deputy Chief Justice Dikgang Moseneke concluded its work in March 2018 and found that government officials acted in breach of the law and the Constitution when they ended the Life Esidimeni contract and moved patients to NGOs without due regard for their wellbeing and state of health.
“During April 2017, the NPA received 144 enquiry dockets regarding Life Esidimeni tragedy and the ADPP then assigned a team of four experienced advocates to the matter to work closely with the investigators in collecting more information to build a solid case.
“Led by a very senior advocate, they devoted most of their attention to a very protracted investigation, converting all 144 enquiry dockets into one docket, guiding investigations and monitoring progress on further documentation/statements that had to be obtained.
“It is this process that has revealed that the evidence at our disposal currently, is not enough to prove causation of death nor is it enough to help us link the actions of different role players to the eventual deaths. It is against these findings and facts of the case as a whole that the state had to make a determination whether a prima facie case justifying prosecution could be made.
“The state therefore correctly sets out the legal principles applicable to the problem and upon thorough assessment of all the available facts and circumstances; came to a conclusion that the matter be referred for a formal inquest.”
For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.
For more news your way
Download our app and read this and other great stories on the move. Available for Android and iOS.