Why does Eskom want to punish people for saving power?
But, is it fair to penalise people who want to save our overall national demand by looking to renewable energy, such as solar?
Eskom logo during the High Tariffs Must Fall Campaign outside Eskom offices in Bellville. Picture: Gallo Images/Brenton Geach
The good news is that, if you want to save money in electricity bills, you can install a solar power array. The bad news is that, if you do so, and you use less of Eskom’s unreliable electricity supply, the power company will charge you more. Eskom’s proposals for a new tariff structure set new standards for rapacious behaviour, either from a private or government organisation. ALSO READ: Bad news for you, worse news for Eskom – Nersa caps tariff increase at 9.61% The utility has applied to increase its charges for the 2023-24 year by a staggering 32.66%. Nersa…
Subscribe to continue reading this article and support trusted South African journalism
Access PREMIUM news, competitions and exclusive benefits
Nersa has been ordered by the High Court in Pretoria to publish the application before 1 August and make a determination by 24 December.
Hidden in the meat of the proposal is one which would see low consumers of power paying a higher fixed price than those who use a lot.
This is called a fixed capacity fee which would, according to Eskom, cover the fixed costs of production and transmission of electricity.
There was, unsurprisingly, no mention of rebates for those times when there is no fixed capacity, which has been up to a quarter of each day recently, thanks to load shedding.
Eskom’s arguments are that it needs such a massive overall tariff increase because previous hikes permitted by Nersa were insufficient to allow investment in new plants and maintenance.
The proposed fixed cost structure, it promises, is not a revenue generator, but intended to rebalance tariffs fairly.