Antoinette Slabbert
3 minute read
17 Mar 2017
8:42 am

First high court judgment for non-payment of e-tolls

Antoinette Slabbert

But Sanral will have to join the line for its money….

Moneyweb has learnt that the High Court in Pretoria in January issued the first default judgment for the non-payment of e-tolls.

A warrant of execution has already been prepared and can now be issued for the sheriff to seize the debtor’s property and sell it in order to raise the funds if the debtor fails to settle the judgment debt.

This follows extreme consumer resistance to electronic toll collection of key freeways in Gauteng. Government has reduced the toll fees considerably, but has nevertheless not been able to get mass support for the system as large numbers of road users continue to refuse to pay up. There have been many questions about the ability of the South African National Roads Agency (Sanral) to enforce e-tolls and this judgment is the first sign since the implementation of the system in December 2012 that those who refuse to pay might actually be brought to book.

According to Sandton attorney Anton Burger a default judgment is the normal outcome if a debtor fails to defend a matter or fails to lodge a plea once he has indicated an intention to defend.

Legal expert Prof Marinus Wiechers says e-toll defaulters should take note that they can be brought before the court. He says since the burden of proof was on Sanral, it is clear that the High Court is satisfied that the proof Sanral submitted is sufficient to justify a ruling in its favour. He said a precedent has now been set, and this judgment has therefore paved the way for many more.

The court ordered an Alberton closed corporation; One Stop Building Supplies CC to pay its outstanding R436 407.57 e-toll debt incurred “on multiple occasions between August 3 2013 and August 31 2015 both dates inclusive.”

It was further ordered to pay interest at the rate of 10.25% as well as the relevant sheriff’s fees.

According to documents before the court the summons was served on the owner of the business Mrs Naomi Strydom on October 25 last year, but One Stop nevertheless failed to defend the matter.

Moneyweb’s numerous efforts to get hold of Strydom were unsuccessful, but a Companies and Intellectual Properties Commission (CIPC) status update made earlier this month indicates that the CC is under voluntary liquidation.

That means that Sanral will most probably have to stand in line like most other creditors to get its share of the liquidated assets of the business.

In response to the judgment Sanral said it has an obligation to collect monies due in terms of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA).

It said the Gauteng freeway network where e-toll applies accommodates 1.49 million vehicle trips per day or 1.7 million people per day. “Importantly, just over 1.3 million vehicles currently have an account with an e-tag, in good standing. In total over 1.4 million vehicles are tagged. Currently in the Violations Processing Center (VPC) there are just over 2.9 million accounts with a balance owing, however 1.2 million thereof owe less than R500 each.

“Finally, 78% of light motor vehicle owners in Gauteng pay less than R100 a month to travel on the GFIP – of these, 44% will have regular e-toll bills smaller than R25.”

Sanral said it is still engaging with the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) about a possible test case and the public will be informed when the parties have agreed on the way forward.

Brought to you by Moneyweb

For more news your way, follow The Citizen on Facebook and Twitter.