Ina Opperman

By Ina Opperman

Business Journalist


Does legislation protect SA consumers?

Government has the biggest responsibility because it enforces the laws that protect us, but why does it not feel like government is doing its job?


We are all consumers, from the president down to a toddler going to nursery school. We all pay for goods and services and we should be protected when we buy and use these goods and services. With our progressive constitution and other laws, such as the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), we should be protected. Are we? The short answer? Not so much. However, it is not only government that should protect consumers, but the private sector, too. Consumers should also protect themselves by ensuring they know enough about their legal rights and responsibilities. Government has the biggest responsibility because it…

Subscribe to continue reading this article
and support trusted South African journalism

Access PREMIUM news, competitions
and exclusive benefits

SUBSCRIBE
Already a member? SIGN IN HERE

We are all consumers, from the president down to a toddler going to nursery school. We all pay for goods and services and we should be protected when we buy and use these goods and services.

With our progressive constitution and other laws, such as the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), we should be protected. Are we? The short answer? Not so much.

However, it is not only government that should protect consumers, but the private sector, too. Consumers should also protect themselves by ensuring they know enough about their legal rights and responsibilities.

Government has the biggest responsibility because it enforces the laws that protect us, but why does it not feel like government is doing its job?

While most consumers are happy with the various ombuds offices, there are other bodies that could work a lot harder for us. Take the National Consumer Commission for example.

The commission seems to only move complaints from one side to another and only cherry pick cases that would get it media exposure, such as the recent furore about the price of garlic and ginger.

People will not go hungry because they cannot afford garlic and ginger. Economists have also warned then that government should not interfere in pricing of goods, but the commission went ahead and made a big noise.

Nobody said anything that the price of sugar beans, a staple for poor people, increased by 33% in the past few months. Maybe sugar beans are not sexy enough? But poor people could go hungry because they cannot afford sugar beans.

The matter was even tackled by the Competition Commission that agreed with Pick n Pay this week to cap its profit on garlic and ginger. Still no news about sugar beans though.

We also still have to see anything happen about timeshare after the commission held public hearings countrywide in 2017 and the report, released in December 2018, suggested some legislative reforms, such as new regulations for the CPA to specify the purchase of points and membership application agreements as fixed term agreements.

For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.

Read more on these topics

Editor’s Choice

Access premium news and stories

Access to the top content, vouchers and other member only benefits