State proved case in Tasha’s restaurant shooting

She accepted the evidence by Pistorius’s friend Darren Fresco and by professional boxer Kevin Lerena, who were with Pistorius at Tasha’s restaurant in Melrose Arch, Johannesburg, in January 2013.

“The accused admitted that he took the firearm from Fresco as he wanted so see it. He wanted to buy a similar firearm,” Masipa read from her judgment, summarising the evidence.

“What is relevant is that the accused asked for a gun in a restaurant full of patrons,” she read.

As Pistorius took the gun, a shot went into the floor, grazing Lerena’s toe.

“The State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused contravened [a] section… of the act,” she said, referring to the Firearms Control Act.

Pistorius is accused of murdering his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp in his Pretoria townhouse on Valentine’s Day last year. He shot her through the locked door of his toilet, apparently thinking she was an intruder about to emerge and attack him. She was hit in the hip, arm, and head.

LIVE VIDEO FEED: Oscar Pistorius Judgment

The paralympian also faces three charges of contravening the Firearms Control Act – one of illegal possession of ammunition and two of discharging a firearm in public. According to count three on the charge sheet he allegedly fired a shot from a Glock pistol under a table at Tasha’s. On count two, on September 30, 2012 he allegedly shot through the open sunroof of a car with his 9mm pistol while driving with friends in Modderfontein.

– Sapa

Follow @CitiReporter on twitter for live updates from inside and outside court or click here for the live twitter feed.