Citizen Reporter
Reporter
3 minute read
22 Sep 2021
3:56 pm

Hlophe’s impeachment process to continue in November, says Parliament

Citizen Reporter

Hlophe's impeachment process has to be in line with section 177 of the Constitution.

National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula. Picture: Gallo Images / Beeld / Theana Breugem

National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula has welcomed the withdrawal of Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe’s review application.

“The speaker of the National Assembly welcomes the abandonment and withdrawal of the urgent application by the judge president of the Western Cape High Court to interdict the National Assembly from proceeding with its consideration and processing of the recommended removal from office by the [Judicial Service Commission],” Parliament’s spokesperson Moloto Mothapo said in a statement.

Abandon

The application was heard virtually by the Johannesburg High Court on Wednesday morning.

Hlophe had filed his application – divided into part A and part B – at the high court last week in a bid to force Parliament to halt the impeachment process against him.

Alongside the impeachment process interdict, part A of the application had also sought to stop President Cyril Ramaphosa from suspending Hlophe.

However, his legal representative, Lihle Sidaki, during Wednesday’s court proceedings decided to abandon this part of the application.

This is due to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) postponing its meeting on Monday, which was expected to decide whether to recommend Hlophe’s suspension to the president.

ALSO READ: Hlophe could escape impeachment, despite JSC’s gross misconduct finding

The withdrawal of part A comes amid the National Assembly’s constituency period, which means the House will reconvene on 3 November.

This means Hlophe’s impeachment process will only proceed then, as the matter is currently being reviewed by the National Assembly’s portfolio committee on justice and correctional services.

Meanwhile, Mothapo indicated that Mapisa-Nqakula had asserted, in her affidavit filed in response to the interdict, that she would abide by the court’s ruling on the matter.

He said the speaker had also contended that the impeachment proceedings would take place after the constituency period ends.

“Therefore, judge president Hlophe can accordingly have no apprehension of the process proceeding until November 2021,” he added.

Impeachment process

The JSC last month found that Hlophe had improperly tried to influence two Constitutional Court (ConCourt) justices to violate their oaths of office by ruling in favour of former president Jacob Zuma.

The matter related to the validity of searches during the arms deal investigation of Zuma and French arms company Thales’ local subsidiary, Thint, in 2008.

In a majority judgment, the JSC concluded that Hlophe was guilty of gross misconduct based on the Judicial Conduct Tribunal’s findings.

Hlophe – in part B of his application – wants to have the high court set aside the tribunal’s findings.

READ MORE: Judge Hlophe’s six main arguments against tribunal ruling

His impeachment process has to be in line with section 177 of the Constitution, which governs the removal of a judge.

In the National Assembly, two-thirds of MPs must vote in favour of Hlophe’s impeachment, which would result in the judge being formally removed from office by Ramaphosa.

If the House does not vote in favour of impeachment, the judge could be sanctioned through punitive measures that include an order for an apology, a reprimand, counselling or training.

Should Hlophe be impeached, he will be the first judge since the advent of democracy to be removed from office.