Former Public Enterprises director-general accused Gordhan of orchestrating the sale 'in an irregular manner'.
Parliament has proposed that the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) be tasked with investigating alleged irregularities in the collapsed South African Airways (SAA)-Takatso deal.
Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan announced the scrapping of the deal to sell 51% of SAA shares to Takatso consortium last week.
While the collapse of the deal has been widely celebrated, calls for the investigation into the process that led to the selection of the equity partner have escalated.
SAA allegations
The Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises met on Wednesday to deliberate and finalise the report of the committee on the petition of the former director-general (DG), Kgathatso Tlhakudi, on allegations of irregularity on the deal.
Tlhakudi laid a complaint against Gordhan in Parliament, that the sale of SAA “was orchestrated in an irregular manner by the minister to benefit a few privileged individuals who were favoured by the minister”.
ALSO READ: ‘SAA won’t collapse…prove naysayers wrong,’ Gordhan tells employees
The former director-general, dismissed from his position in June 2023, has also claimed that he never signed a document proposing Takatso as strategic equity partner.
Gordhan has previously dismissed as “baseless” the allegations by Tlhakudi that he interfered and handpicked the Takatso Consortium as the preferred bidder to purchase the 51% shareholding in SAA.
“These claims are patently false and are emblematic of someone who is refusing to be held accountable, and is instead clutching at straws, and looking for public sympathy through deception and lies,” Gordhan said.
Tlhakudi’s signature forged?
The committee on Wednesday said the SIU should be roped in to investigate the allegations.
“Law enforcement agencies must do their work in unravelling the truth about this transaction, particularly the alleged forgery of the former DG’s signature in the equity appointment process.
“I think that is the understanding that I would wish the committee to look [at] when we go in,” the committee’s chairperson, Khaya Magaxa said.
“One would ask where are the documents and all that – I think we got what we wanted in those documents, all that was left in the documents was to discover or establish after all the other documents we received, whether Takatso was among the four companies that were shortlisted. We have noticed that it was not among those companies.
READ MORE: ‘He won’t be missed’ – Analyst on news of Pravin Gordhan retiring
“Takatso of course made it to that list after RMB, a transactional adviser left, and then the department developed a new team within itself and in the finalisation of the process, then included Takatso.
“Even the manner in which that process was completed is questionable in the sense that the department did not have the capacity, hence they decided to outsource.
“It’s questionable that in their decision to continue with the process, they could not advertise again to get an agent that was to play the same role that was played by RMB.”
SIU must probe Takatso-SAA deal
UDM chief whip Nqaba Kwankwa also supported the proposal of roping in the SIU for the investigation, saying Parliament does not have the investigative ability to do so.
“It’s not even our primary mandate to do so, to be able to scrutinise and look into these things and do further investigations.
“Indeed, we agree with the suggestion that the SIU and other relevant law enforcement agencies should be tasked with the process of investigating this matter forward, so that those who are found at fault as far as this transaction is concerned are held to account without fear or favour,” he said.
NOW READ: ‘He’s made a mess of SAA sale’ – Ramaphosa urged to fire Gordhan over Takatso deal
