Zondo commission accused of protecting journalists paid by Bosasa
Questions have been asked as to why Agrizzi was not requested to name journalists, but was requested to name politicians.
Angelo Agrizzi, former COO of Bosasa, a company that had contracts with government institutions, testifies at the Commission of Inquiry into State Capture investigating alleged corruption under ex-president Jacob Zuma. AFP/WIKUS DE WET
The failure of the Zondo commission of inquiry into state capture to ask former Bosasa COO Angelo Agrizzi to name the three journalists he alleged were paid to write favourable stories about the controversial company has been called into question on social media.
The Citizen reported earlier on Thursday that Agrizzi told the commission of inquiry into state capture that the company paid journalists to write positive stories about the controversial company.
Some have identified what they see as a double standard, as politicians have been named at the commission at Deputy Chief Justice Zondo’s request, leading them to question why journalists have not.
One user accused Zondo of “protecting journalists” and another accused the commission of “deliberately avoiding asking Agrizzi to name” the alleged paid journalists.
Agrizzi does not name the journalists being paid.
(Hopefully Pretorius will ask!!)#StateCaptureInquiry
— Ranjeni Munusamy (@RanjeniM) January 24, 2019
#StateCaptureInquiry: Agrizzi says Bosasa bribed govt officials. He is asked to name names. He does, and also names amounts paid to each govt official. Then he says Bosasa bribed journalists. No names are sought. For the sake of Commission integrity I hope this will be rectified
— JudgeJohnDeed (@vngalwana) January 24, 2019
I feel like Zondo is protecting Journalists at #StateCaptureInquiry why don't he ask Agrizzi to name them yet Politicians have been named https://t.co/EwaGJ1n5CK
— Jolinkomo (@ThamiMilis) January 24, 2019
@StateCaptureCom deliberately avoiding asking Agrizzi to name Journalist paid, this is a deviation from a norm in Agrizzi testimony by Pretorius, who would push him for clear details etc, commission avoiding meltdown once journalists are named or suppressing transparency? 👀😲
— Wele Segalo (@WeleSeg) January 24, 2019
If they don't order #Agrizzi to name journalists who were on #Bosasa pay-roll, then we're well within our rights to apply a blanket approach to all journalists as Bosasa vigilante journalists. #BosasaBribes#StateCaptureInquiry
— Bra Hloni (@BraHlonisky) January 24, 2019
#StateCaptureInquiry Was hoping that Agrizzi would name the journalists implicated in the corruption at Bosasa. We want to know. #sabcnews
— mzwandile mbeje (@mzwaimbeje) January 24, 2019
https://twitter.com/Mshengu_1/status/1088352738294054912
A recent Times Live report claimed Agrizzi had instructed his colleagues to donate R100,000 to the 2016 crowdfunding effort to help The SABC8, a group of journalists who defied then COO Hlaudi Motsoeneng’s orders to not show violent service delivery protests.
The publication further claimed to have seen a leaked email in which the donation was described as “the best return on investment ever” but added they were not able to trace the funds back to Bosasa despite consulting sources close to the story.
The South African National Editors’ Forum (SANEF) has since hit back against the claims, and Agrizzi himself said yesterday it was untrue.
“We have had the opportunity to go through [each] of the 394 donations made in July 2016 to the cause and could not find any donation from Bosasa and/or a person connected to Bosasa or a donation for R100,000,” said the organisation’s leadership in a statement.
READ MORE: Agrizzi tables confidential documents Bosasa paid NPA officials for
The group of journalists themselves have also released a statement.
“We do not know who the donors were in the crowdfunding initiative, some identified themselves and some remained anonymous,” they said.
They went on to add that “it is interesting to note that the same Bosasa that apparently funded us is the same one that paid the legal costs for Hlaudi Motsoeneng, against whom we fought to save a public asset from further capture”.
“We remain steadfast and committed and we will not be swayed by the purveyors of fake news and lies,” the statement concluded.
(Compiled by Daniel Friedman. Additional reporting by Makhosandile Zulu and Kaunda Selisho)
For more news your way, download The Citizen’s app for iOS and Android.
