Zuma and Thales sought a permanent stay of prosecution, claiming that the prolonged delays had infringed their right to a fair trial.
Former president Jacob Zuma. Picture: File
Former president Jacob Zuma and French arms company Thales have been dealt a legal blow after the Pietermaritzburg High Court ruled that their corruption trial will go ahead.
The crucial matter returned to the Pietermaritzburg High Court on Wednesday.
Judgement
Judge Nkosinathi Chili handed down judgement on their application for leave to appeal the court’s earlier decision dismissing their application to have the charges dropped.
“I am not persuaded that another court will find differently.
“Both Mr Zuma and Thales conceded that this court was correct in concluding that the relief sought, directing the state to stop the prosecution in terms of Section 6B of the Act, was incompetent. It is, therefore, not necessary to delay at this point,” Chilli said.
Zuma and Thales
Chili said at the inception of Advocate Dali Mpofu’s argument, he reiterated that comments made during the hearing of the application that the application before the court was not that of Zuma’s, but that of Thales.
“In his words, they were merely passengers in the motor vehicle, driven by Thales. Those comments reinforced the findings made by this court that if Thales’ case fails, then Mr Zuma’s should also fail.”
Zuma and Thales sought a permanent stay of prosecution, claiming that the prolonged delays had infringed their right to a fair trial.
Chilli adjourned the matter to 24 April to give judgment on the state’s application and to set a trial date.
[WATCH] Pietermaritzburg High Court judge Nkosinathi Chili delivers the ruling on whether he will grant former president Jacob Zuma and his co-accused French arms company, Thales, leave to appeal his earlier decision dismissing their application for acquittal. #Newzroom405 pic.twitter.com/OWnEIix0dX
— Newzroom Afrika (@Newzroom405) February 4, 2026
Delays
In February 2025, Thales cited lengthy delays that had resulted in an “irremediable infringement of its constitutional rights to a fair trial” in an application to have charges against it dropped and to be acquitted.
Thales sought an order halting the NPA from pursuing the corruption and racketeering case against it.
ALSO READ: State can’t argue against Zuma’s repeated attempts to remove Downer, lawyer insists
Supporting application
In April, Zuma filed an affidavit that supported the application brought by Thales on 5 February 2025, seeking to be acquitted on the basis that the state “misconstrued Thales’ cause of action as being based on an infringement of its right to have its trial begin and conclude without unreasonable delays”.
Thales contends that its defence has been severely compromised by the deaths of two key witnesses — former directors Pierre Moynot and Alain Thétard — who both lived in South Africa during the arms deal period. Moynot died in January 2021, and Thétard in Germany in September 2022. The company only obtained formal confirmation of their deaths in late 2021 and in 2024, respectively.
Ruling
However, in June, Judge Chili ruled that the court had no authority to withdraw charges and was not convinced that the accused would suffer irreparable prejudice.
Arms deal
It is the state’s case that Zuma was kept on a corrupt retainer by his former financial advisor, Schabir Shaik, who then used his political clout to further his own business interests.
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) also claimed that Shaik facilitated a R500 000-a-year bribe for Zuma from French arms company Thales in exchange for his “political protection” from a potentially damaging arms deal inquiry.
NOW READ: Downer dismisses Zuma’s allegations of ‘racist undertones’ in legal strategy
Support Local Journalism
Add The Citizen as a Preferred Source on Google and follow us on Google News to see more of our trusted reporting in Google News and Top Stories.
